General
practice
EAR INFECTION
FROM THE BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
kindly reprinted from my purchased copy
Froom
J, Culpepper L, Grob P, Barteld A, Bowers P, Bridges-Webb
C, et al. Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute
otitis media: report from International Primary Care
Network. BMJ
1990;300:582-6.
Antimicrobials
for acute otitis media? a review from the international
primary care network
Jack
Froom,
professor
of family medicine,a
Larry Culpepper,
professor
of family medicine,b
Max Jacobs,
associate
professor of family medicine,c
Ruut A DeMelker,
professor
of family medicine,c
Larry A Green,
Woodward-Chisholm
chairman of family medicine,d
Louk van Buchem,
otorhinolaryngologist,e
Paul Grob,
professor
of general practice,f
Timothy Heeren,
associate
professor of biostatistics and
epidemiology b
a
State
University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794,
USA,
b
Boston
University, Boston, MA 02118, USA,
c
University of
Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands,
d
University of
Colorado, Denver, CO 80220, USA,
e
St
Elizabeth Hospital, 500 LC Tilburg,
Netherlands,
f
University of
Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5YG
Correspondence
to: Professor Larry Culpepper Department of Family
Medicine, Dowling 5 South, 1 Boston Medical Center Place,
Boston, MA 02118-2393, USA.
Introduction
Increasing
worldwide resistance of bacteria to antimicrobial
drugs is
causing a crisis, manifested by higher morbidity,
mortality, and
costs.1
In
1992 the Institute of Medicine in the United
States warned
of the growing threat posed by resistant
bacteria,2
and
in 1994 the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta
initiated a prevention
strategy,3
linked to a
global plan by the World Health
Organisation.4
Proposed
remedies include development of new
antimicrobials, improved
sanitation, and educating patients not to ask
for
antimicrobials when they are
not useful and physicians to prescribe
them conservatively.5
About 30% of
British children under the age of 3 visit their
general
practitioner for acute otitis media each
year6
and
97% receive
antimicrobials.7
In
America it is the most common reason for
outpatient
antimicrobial use. Because this use has uncertain
benefits, it
merits reconsideration.
Increasing
resistance to antimicrobial agents has been reported
for
the three most common bacterial causes of otitis media
(Streptococcus
pneumoniae,
Haemophilus influenzae, and
Moraxella
catarrhalis),
but
rates differ between countries.8
9 In England and
Wales in 1990-5,
resistance to penicillin by S
pneumoniae increased
from 1.5% to
3.9% and to erythromycin from 2.8% to
8.6%.10
Except in the
Netherlands,
antimicrobials are standard
treatment for acute
otitis media in most developed
countries.7
11 Although
type and
duration vary between countries, generally
ampicillin, amoxycillin, or
co-amoxiclav (amoxycillin-clavulanate) are
preferred,with co-trimoxazole
a low cost alternative.7
In
the Netherlands, treatment of
symptoms without
antimicrobials has been
adopted as routine
initial treatment for otitis media,12
and
this policy is associated
with decreased emergence of resistance among
organisms commonly found
in otitis media.13
14 This approach
also is being adopted in
Iceland.15
Does
treatment improve outcomes?
Seven
randomised blinded studies have compared
antimicrobials with placebo in
patients with acute otitis media (table
1)
).16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 Comparisons
aredifficult because inclusion criteria,
outcome measures, duration of follow up, and the period
when studies were
conducted are different. Also some studies had
insufficient
power to evaluate small to moderate differences.
Nevertheless,
since results are mixed and no study found large
differences between placebo
and antimicrobial groups, we conclude that the
benefit of
routine antimicrobial use for otitis media, judged
by
either short or long term outcomes, is unproved.
Summary points
Bacterial
resistance to
antimicrobials is responsible
for increasing morbidity, mortality, and costs
The most frequent use of
antimicrobials in the United
States is for otitis media
Evidence from randomised, placebo controlled trials that
routine use of
antimicrobials decreases the
duration and severity of symptoms and prevents
complications is weak
Treatment of acute otitis media differs worldwide, and
careful use of
antimicrobials in the
Netherlands and Iceland seems to have reduced rates of
resistance among organisms without compromising outcomes
The management of acute otitis media needs reassessing
A recent meta-analysis concluded that one child out of
seven benefits from
treatment,24
but
only four of the 33 studies included had placebo or
no medication groups,16
19
21
19 and no
justification was given for
excluding severalmethodologically sound placebo
controlled
studies.18
20
22 In contrast,
after reviewing 50 trials,
Claessen et al judged that methodological flaws
precluded making
recommendations.26
Does
treatment prevent complications?
Although
preventing mastoiditis and meningitis is a rationale
for
antimicrobial treatment, little evidence exists that
routine treatment is
effective for this purpose. Mastoiditis, a commonly
reported complication of
otitis media in the preantimicrobial era, is
now
uncommon. It is uncertain, however, whether the
decrease is related to
antimicrobial treatment, changes in clinical course
and
organism virulence, or increased host resistance.
Also, uncomplicated
otitis media often might not have come to medical
attention in
the era before
antimicrobials, increasing
the relative rate of
reported complications.
Questions
related to the routine use of
antimicrobials
for acute otitis media
* Are the course of and outcomes after acute otitis media
improved by antimicrobial treatment?
* Do
antimicrobials prevent
complications of acute otitis media?
* Which children are at high risk of poor outcomes after
acute otitis media? Do they benefit from
antimicrobials?
* If
antimicrobials are used, are
the optimum type and duration of administration known?
* Have management options, other than routine antimicrobial
administration, been widely used and with what results?
* Does decreased use of
antimicrobials for acute
otitis media influence the development of antimicrobial
resistance?
Selective use of
antimicrobials might yield the
same benefit as routine use.
In the Netherlands, among 4860 consecutive patients
with acute
otitis media who were not given
antimicrobials, only
two
experienced mastoiditis; both responded to treatment
with oral
antimicrobial as outpatients.27
Justification
for routine antimicrobial treatment of
otitis media to prevent meningitis is equally weak.
None of the
4860 patients developed meningitis. Kilpi et al
reported that
positive blood cultures in children with bacterial
meningitis were
equally common in those treated and not treated
with
antimicrobials before
admission (77% and 78%).28
Even
when otitis media
and meningitis coexist, they are likely to result
from a common
upper respiratory infection with haematogenous
spread, rather
than direct spread from ear to meninges.29
It
therefore
remains uncertain whether either routine or
selective antimicrobial
treatment prevents the complications of mastoiditis
and
meningitis.
Do
children at high risk benefit from
antimicrobials?
Adverse
consequences of otitis media include lack of
bacteriological or clinical
resolution, recurrent infection, persistent
effusion, hearing loss,
adenoidectomy, and insertion of a tympanostomy
tube . No study
has addressed whether antimicrobial treatment
decreases the
frequency of these in all or some of those with
known risk
factors.
The most
important risk factors for poor outcome are young
age and attendance
at day care centres. In a study of two groups
of
children infected with S
pneumoniae, comparable by
sex, age at first
attack, and frequency of earlier attacks, more
penicillin resistant
strains were isolated in those under 18 months
(P=0.003).30
Decreased rates
of bacteriological or clinical
resolution7
22
31 and increased
rates ofrecurrence,32
adenoidectomy,
and insertion of a
tympanostomy tube33
are
other consequences reported in children under
2 years old.
Day care is a
risk factor for poor outcomes, including recurrent
infection,34
admission to
hospital, adenoidectomy, and insertion of a
tympanostomy tube.33
After other
risk factors (age <2 years, white race,
male sex, and history of tonsillitis, enlarged
adenoids, or asthma) were
controlled for, children in day care had a 50%
higher chance
of repeated ear infections than those not in day
care.35
In
a nine country study, children in day care were more
likely to have
a history of poor hearing, tympanostomy tubes,
tonsillectomy, or
adenoidectomy and to be referred to an otolaryngologist
at the initial
visit.36
Other factors
likely to contribute to poor recovery include
multiple
previous episodes,37
bottle
feeding,38
history of
ear infections in
parents or siblings,39
and
use of a dummy.40
Although
exposure to
tobacco smoke has been considered a contributor
to
poor outcome, the evidence is controversial and the
effect weak at
best.41
Although risk
factors are known, no study has shown that
antimicrobial treatment improves outcome in children
at
risk.
What
is the optimal type and duration of administration?
In the nine
country study,
antimicrobials did not improve
outcome at two months,
and no differences in rates of recovery were
found for
either antimicrobial type or duration.7
The
optimum duration of
antimicrobial treatment for otitis media is
uncertain. There is
evidence that two days,42
three
days,43
five
days,44
and
10
days are equally effective. Treatment for more than a
few days might have
little local effect. In a study of antimicrobial
penetrance of
the middle ear, penicillin concentrations decreased
by
about 70% after the second day of treatment (compared
with the first day),
suggesting that penetration depends on
inflammation.45
No
compelling evidence
After
addressing these four questions, we conclude that
existing research offers
no compelling evidence that children with acute
otitis media
routinely given
antimicrobials have a shorter
duration of symptoms,
fewer recurrences, or better long term outcomes
than those who
do not receive them. It also is not clear that
routine
compared with selective use of
antimicrobials prevents
complications.
Thus it is prudent to reconsider routine use
of
antimicrobials for otitis
media and to consider other approaches.
What
are the effects of other management options?
Dutch family
physicians use
antimicrobials for upper
respiratory tract
infections more conservatively than doctors in other
countries (see
box).18
27 A World Health
Organisation study of tonsillitis in 17 European
countries found that 68% of Dutch patients received
antimicrobials compared with
94% in other countries.46
In
1990 the Dutch
College of General Practitioners adopted a guideline
for
treating acute otitis media. It has received
widespread use in the
Netherlands, but its adoption elsewhere requires
consideration
of the current healthcare system, particularly
the
ability of parents to access care for their children
initially and if they
fail to improve after treatment of symptoms.
Dutch
guideline for the treatment of acute otitis
media*12
Patients 2
years and older
* Treatment of symptoms only (paracetamol with or without
decongestant nose drops) for the first three days
* Re-evaluation if symptoms (pain or fever thought to be
due to acute otitis media) continue for three days. At that
time the doctor may continue additional observation or give
an antimicrobial (amoxycillin, or erythromycin if
amoxycillin is contraindicated) for seven days
* Special treatment for tympanic membrane perforation is
not suggested unless it persists for 14 days, at which time
a course of
antimicrobials is suggested
Children
between the ages of 6 months and 2 years
* Management is the same as for those 2 years and older,
except for a mandatory contact (either telephone or visit)
after 24 hours. If there is no improvement doctors may
either start
antimicrobials or wait an
additional 24 hours
* Referral to an otolaryngologist suggested if patients in
this age group appear to be seriously ill or do not improve
after 24 hours of treatment with
antimicrobials
*
An
English translation of the guideline is available from: The
Dutch College of General Practitioners, Domus Medica, PO
Box 323, 3502 GE Utrecht, Netherlands
Has this guideline resulted in more complications in Dutch
children? While no
controlled study has addressed this question, van
Buchem et al found
that only 2.7% of 4860 children given symptomatic
treatment and
no antimicrobial drug developed persistent fever,
pain, or
persistent discharge after three to four days and
only two developed
mastoiditis.27
Compared with
cases in seven other countries where
antimicrobial therapy is virtually universal,
Dutch patients
had similar outcomes at two months.7
Thus
Dutch experience
suggests feasible alternatives to antimicrobial
treatment exist.
What
is the effect on antimicrobial resistance?
Antimicrobial
use in children with otitis media results in the
emergence of
resistant organisms in those children and in the
community.
Among children previously given
antimicrobials for
otitis media,
Harrison et al found a rate of ampicillin resistance
in
bacteria in effusions obtained during a subsequent bout
of otitis media
that was three times higher than normal.47
Significant
increases in
resistant strains of H
influenzae,
M
catarrhalis,48
and
S
pneumoniae
49 have been
reported among children with otitis media who have
had previous antimicrobial treatment. Development
and
spread of multiply resistant pneumococci after
treatment for otitis
media have been documented in day care centres and
surrounding
communities,50
including
instances that have led to deaths from
meningitis in children treated previously for
uncomplicated acute otitis
media.51
Although the
organisms that cause otitis media are similar across
countries,52
the
Netherlands has a lower prevalence of resistant
strains than
other European countries. A study in 1989 in the
Netherlands
found that only 3% of 1100 S
pneumoniae cultures
showed
decreased sensitivity to penicillin compared with
more than 10% in
most countries.14
53 Similarly, 4.7%
of non-type B
H
influenzae isolates from
respiratory tract infections were resistant to
amoxycillin—less than the 10% overall rate
in
Europe.13
In Iceland,
penicillin resistant pneumococci appeared in 1988
and
increased to nearly 20% of pneumococcal infections by
1993.54
After a
campaign to decrease antimicrobial use, particularly
for
otitis media, and to control spread of infections in
day care centres,
this rate declined to 16.9% in 1994. The presence
of
resistant pneumococci among carriers who are day care
attendees declined from
20% (21 of 104) in 1992 to 15% (19 of 126) in
1995.15
Nevertheless,
it is not possible to state with certainty
that decreased
use of
antimicrobials results in
decreased resistance in endemic
bacteria.
What
needs to be done?
Research—Placebo
studies indicate that more than 80% of children with
acute otitis media recover without
antimicrobials.
Antimicrobials might be useful
for some of the remainder, but evidence of
benefit is lacking. A trial should be designed to
study
antimicrobial effectiveness in children at high risk
for poor outcomes,
using carefully chosen outcome measures, with
sufficient
numbers of patients for subgroup analyses.
Prevention
of acute otitis media—Sufficient
information exists to support
aggressive encouragement of breast feeding and
avoidance of tobacco
smoke.38
55 There is
insufficient evidence of effectiveness to recommend
pneumococcal vaccine.56
Over 70% of
cases of acute otitis media
are immediately preceded by viral respiratory
infections,31
and
there is convincing evidence that contaminated hands
and surfaces are
more important than airborne respiratory droplets
in
viral transmission.57
58 Campaigns to
encourage day care centres to
increase hand washing by staff and children and the
use
of virocidal agents to wipe surfaces might reduce viral
transmission and subsequent
otitis media.
Treatment
of acute otitis media—Clinicians
should immediately reconsider the
routine use of
antimicrobials for children
with otitis media
and consider treating symptoms with analgesics
and
observation for lack of improvement. Children less
than 2 years old
require frequent re-evaluation if not treated.
Doctors are often
uncertain about the diagnosis of otitis media
7; in
such
circumstances in particular
antimicrobials should be
withheld. If
antimicrobials are used they
should be given for less than 10 days. In
addition doctors should identify modifiable risks
for
poor outcome and work with parents to eliminate them.
The potential
benefits of these actions are profound. They could
reduce costs
without compromising outcomes while reducing the
risk of
bacterial resistance.
Acknowledgements
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr Max Jacobs,
whose intellect, wit, and
ability to solve problems internationally made our
collaboration
possible. He died suddenly on 21 December 1996.
Funding: Agency
for Health Care Policy and Research, Grant No.
RO1
HS07035-03.
Conflict of
interest: None.
References
1. Neu HC. The crisis in antibiotic resistance.
Science
1992;257:1036-8.
[Medline]
2. Lederberg J, Shope RE, Oaks SC, eds. Emerging
infections: microbial threats to health in the United
States. Washington,
DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1992.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Addressing
emerging infectious disease threats. Atlanta: US
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, 1994.
4. LeDuc JW. World Health Organization strategy for
emerging infectious diseases. JAMA
1996;275:318-20.
5. Cohen ML. Epidemiology of drug resistance: implications
for a post-antimicrobial era. Science
1992;257:1050-5.
6. Ross AK, Croft PR, Collins M. Incidence of acute otitis
media in infants in a general practice. J R Coll
Gen Pract 1988;38:70-2.
7.
Froom J,
Culpepper L, Grob P, Barteld A, Bowers P, Bridges-Webb C,
et al. Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis
media: report from International Primary Care
Network.
BMJ 1990;300:582-6.
8. Faden H, Doern G, Wolf J, Blocker M. Antimicrobial
susceptibility of nasopharyngeal isolates of potential
pathogens recovered from infants before antibiotic therapy:
implications for the management of otitis media.
Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1994;13:609-12.
[Medline]
9. Henderson KW, Gilligan PH, Wait K, Goff DA.
Nasopharyngeal carriage of antibiotic-resistant pneumococci
by children in group day care. J Infect
Dis 1988;157:256-63.
[Medline]
10. Johnson AP, Speller DCE, George RC, Warner M, Domingue
G, Efstratiou A. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance to
pneumococci in England and Wales: results of observational
surveys in 1990 and 1995. BMJ
1996;312:1454-6.
[Abstract/Free
Full Text]
11. De Melker RA, Kuyvenhoven MM. Management of upper
respiratory infection in Dutch general practice.
Br J Gen
Pract 1991;41:504-7.
12. Appelman CLM, Bossen PC, Dunk JHM, van de Lisdonk EH,
de Melker RA, van Weert HCPM. Guideline.
Dutch College of Family Doctors. Acute otitis
media. Utrecht:
Dutch College of Family Doctors, 1990.
13. Machka K, Braveny I, Dabernat H, Dombusch K, van Dyck
E, Kayser FH, et al. Distribution and resistance patterns
of Haemophilus
influenzae: a European
Cooperative study. Eur J Clin
Microbiol Infect Dis 1988;7:14-24.
14. De Neeling AJ, Hemmes JH, van Klingeren B.
Resistentie
tegen antibiotica bij routine isolaten van bacteriën in
zeven streeklaboratoria (English
abstract). Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid
en Milieuhygiene, 1993 (report No 253601001).
15. Stephenson J. Icelandic researchers are showing the way
to bring down rates of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria. JAMA
1996;275:175-6.
[Medline]
16. Halsted C, Lepow ML, Balassanian N, Emmerich J,
Wolinsky E. Otitis media: clinical observations,
microbiology, and evaluation of therapy.
Am J Dis Child 1968;115:542-51.
17. Howie VM, Ploussard JH. Effectiveness of erythromycin
estolate, triple sulfonamide, ampicillin, erythromycin
estolate-triple sulfonamide, and placebo in 280 patients
with acute otitis media under 2 and one-half years of
age. Clin
Pediatr 1972;11:205-14.
[Medline]
18. van Buchem FL, Dunk JHM, van't Hof MA. Therapy of acute
otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics, or neither: a
double-blind study in children. Lancet
1981;ii:883-7.
19. Mygind N, Meistrup-Larsen KI, Thomsen J, Thomsen VF,
Josefsson K, Sorensen H. Penicillin in acute otitis media:
a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Clin
Otolaryngol 1981;6:5-13.
20. Kaleida PH, Casselbrant ML, Rockette HE, Paradise JL,
Bluestone CD, Blatter MM, et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy
or both for acute otitis media: results of a randomized
clinical trial. Pediatrics
1991;87:466-74.
21. Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dunleavey J. Acute red ear
in children: controlled trial of non-antibiotic treatment
in general practice. BMJ
1991;303:558-62.
[Medline]
22. Appelman CLM, Claessen JQPJ, Touw-Otten FWMM, Hordijk
GJ, DeMelker RA. Co-amoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis
media: placebo controlled study. BMJ
1991;303:1450-2.
23. Claessen JQPJ, Appleman CLM, Touw-Otten FWMM, de Melker
RA, Hordijk GJ. Persistence of middle ear dysfunction after
recurrent acute otitis media. Clin
Otolaryngol 1994;19:35-40.
24. Rosenfeld RM, Vertrees JE, Carr J, Cipolle RJ, Uden DL,
Giebink GS, et al. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs
for acute otitis media: meta-analysis of 5400 children from
thirty-three randomized trials. J
Pediatrics 1994;124:355-67.
[Medline]
25. Laxdal OE, Merida J, Trefor Jones RH. Treatment of
acute otitis media: a controlled study of 142
children. Can Med
Assoc J 1970;102:263-8.
26. Claessen JQPJ, Appleman CLM, Touw-Otten FWMM, de Melker
RA, Hordijk GJ. A review of clinical trials regarding
treatment of acute otitis media. Clin
Otolaryngol 1992;17:251-7.
27. Van Buchem FL, Peeters MF, van't Hof MA. Acute otitis
media: a new treatment strategy. BMJ
1985;290:1033-7.
28. Kilpi T, Anttila M, Kallio MJ, Peltola H. Severity of
childhood bacterial meningitis: duration of illness before
diagnosis. Lancet
1991;338:406-9.
[Medline]
29. Eavey RD, Gao Y-Z, Schuknecht HF, Gonzalez-Pineda M.
Otologic features of bacterial meningitis of
childhood. Pediatrics
1985;106(3):402-7.
30. Barry B, Gehanno P, Blumen M, Boucot I. Clinical
outcome of acute otitis media caused by pneumococci with
decreased susceptibility to penicillin. Scand J
Infect Dis 1994;26:446-52.
[Medline]
31.
Froom J,
Culpepper L, Grob P, Barteld A, Bowers P, Bridges-Webb C,
et al. Effect of patient characteristics and disease
manifestations on the outcome of acute otitis media at two
months.
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:841-6.
32. Rasmussen F. Recurrence of acute otitis media at
preschool age in Sweden. J Epidemiol
Community Health 1994;48:33-5.
33. Alho OP, Koivu M, Sorri M, Oja H, Kilkku O. Which
children are being operated on for recurrent acute otitis
media? Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:807-11.
34. Louhiala PJ, Jaakkola N, Ruotsalainen R, Jaakkola JJ.
Form of day care and respiratory infection among Finnish
children. Am J Public
Health 1995;85:1109-12.
35. Hardy AM, Fowler MG. Child care arrangements and
repeated ear infections in young children.
Am J Public
Health 1993;83:1321-5.
36.
Froom J,
Culpepper L. Otitis media in day care children: a report
from the International Primary Care Network.
J Fam Pract 1991;32:289-94.
37. Alho OP, Oja H, Koivu M, Sorri M. Risk factors for
chronic otitis media with effusion in infancy. Each acute
otitis media episode induces a high but transient
risk. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:839-43.
38. Sassen ML, Brand R, Grote JJ. Breast-feeding and acute
otitis media. Am J
Otolaryngol 1994;15:351-7.
39. Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner B. Epidemiology of otitis
media during the first seven years of life in children in
greater Boston: a prospective cohort study.
J Infect
Dis 1989;160:83-94.
[Medline]
40. Niemela M, Uhari M, Mottonen M. A pacifier increases
the risk of recurrent acute otitis media in children in day
care centers. Pediatrics
1995;96:884-8.
[Abstract]
41. Blakley BW, Blakley JE. Smoking and middle ear disease:
are they related? A review article. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg 1995;112:441-6.
42. Meistrup-Larsen KI, Sorensen H, Johnsen NJ, Thomsen J,
Mygind N, Sederberg-Olsen J. Two versus seven days
penicillin treatment for acute otitis media.
Acta
Otolaryngol 1983;96:99-104.
43. Chaput de Saintonge DM, Levine DF, Savage IT, Gurgess
GWS. Trial of three-day and ten-day course of amoxycillin
in otitis media. BMJ
1982;284:1078-81.
[Medline]
44. Hendrickse WA, Kusmiesz H, Shelton S, Nelson JD. Five
vs. ten days of therapy for acute otitis media.
Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1988;7:17-23.
45. Lundgren K, Ingvarsson L, Rudcrantz H. The
concentration of penicillin-V in middle ear exudate.
J Pediatr
Otorhinolaryngol 1979;1:93-6.
46. Touw-Otten FW, Johansen KS. Diagnosis, antibiotic
treatment and outcome of acute tonsillitis: report of a WHO
regional office for Europe study in 17 European
countries. Fam
Pract 1992;9:255-64.
47. Harrison CJ, Marks MI, Welch DF. Microbiology of
recently treated acute otitis media compared with
previously untreated acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 1985;4:641-6.
48. Faden H, Bernstein J, Stanievich J, Brodsky L, Ogra PL.
Effect of prior antibiotic treatment on middle ear disease
in children. Ann Otol
Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:87-91.
[Medline]
49. Ford KL, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL, Lamberth LB, Tillman
J. Factors associated with middle ear isolates of
Streptococcus
pneumoniae resistant to
penicillin in a children's hospital. J
Pediatrics 1991;119:941-4.
[Medline]
50. Reichler MR, Allphin AA, Breiman RF, Schreiber JR,
Arnold JE, McDougal LK, et al. The spread of multiply
resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae at a day care
center in Ohio. J Infect
Dis 1992;166:1346-53.
51. Sloas MM, Barrett FF, Chesney PJ, English BK, Hill BC,
Tenover FC, et al. Cephalosporin treatment failure in
penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae meningitis.
Pediatr
Infect Dis J 1992;11:662-6.
52. Bluestone CD, Klein JO. Otitis
media in infants and children. Philadelphia:
WB Saunders Company, 1988:45-8.
53. Van Klingeren B, Michelen MF, Wagenvoort JHT.
Beheersing van het resistentievraagstuk door het voeren van
een antbioticum beleid. Ned
Tijdschr Geneeskd 1992;136:860-4.
[Medline]
54. Aarason
VA, Kristinson KG, Sigurdsson JA, Stefansdottir G, Molstad
S. Do
antimicrobials increase
carriage rate of penicillin resistant pneumococci in
children?
BMJ 1996;313:387-91.
[Abstract/Free
Full Text]
55. Stenstrom R, Bernard PAM, Ben-Simhon H. Exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke as a risk factor for recurrent
acute otitis media in children under the age of five
years. Int J
Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1993;27:127-36.
56. Lee CJ, Wang TR. Pneumococcal infection and
immunization in children. Crit Rev
Microbiol 1994;20:1-12.
57. Gwaltney JM, Hendley JO. Transmission of experimental
rhinovirus infection by contaminated surface.
Am J
Epidemiol 1982;116:828-33.
58. Murray BE. Can antibiotic resistance be
controlled? N Engl J
Med 1994;330:1229-30.
[Free
Full Text]
(Accepted
28 May 1997)
This
article has been cited by other articles:
L.
Mascitelli and F. Pezzetta
Recurrent
Otitis Media in Children
JAMA, March 19, 2003; 289(11): 1383 - 1383.
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. F.
Chen, J. M. Westfall, T. Fahey, N. Stocks, S. H. Woolf, N.
Brooks, A.-C. Nyquist, R. Gonzales, J. F. Steiner, M. A.
Sande, B. Schwartz, and A. G. Mainous III
Antibiotics
for Children With Upper Respiratory Tract
Infections
JAMA, October 28, 1998; 280(16): 1399 - 1402.
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.
Nyfors, E. Kononen, R. Syrjanen, E. Komulainen, and H.
Jousimies-Somer
Emergence of
penicillin resistance among Fusobacterium nucleatum
populations of commensal oral flora during early
childhood
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2003;
51(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. O.
Hendley
Otitis
Media
N. Engl. J. Med., October 10, 2002; 347(15): 1169
- 1174.
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.
Little, C. Gould, M. Moore, G. Warner, J. Dunleavey, I.
Williamson, C. Del Mar, and J. Doust
Predictors of
poor outcome and benefits from antibiotics in children with
acute otitis media: pragmatic randomised trial *
Commentary: research directions for treatment for acute
otitis media
BMJ, July 6, 2002; 325(7354): 22 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
N.
Zwar, J. Henderson, H. Britt, K. McGeechan, and G. Yeo
Influencing
antibiotic prescribing by prescriber feedback and
management guidelines: a 5-year
follow-up
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should Acute
Otitis Patients Get Antibiotics?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine,
September 1, 1997; 1997(901): 3 - 3.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. M.
Verduin, C. Hol, A. Fleer, H. van Dijk, and A. van Belkum
Moraxella
catarrhalis: from Emerging to Established
Pathogen
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2002; 15(1):
125 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E.
Westman and A. Melhus
The treatment
of Haemophilus influenzae acute otitis media with
amoxicillin protects against reinfection but not against
structural changes
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2002;
49(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.
Melhus
Effects of
amoxicillin on the expression of cytokines during
experimental acute otitis media caused by non-typeable
Haemophilus influenzae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2001;
48(3): 397 - 402.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. C.
J. Johansen, T. Lildholdt, N. Damsbo, and E. W. Eriksen
Tympanometry
for diagnosis and treatment of otitis media in general
practice
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2000; 17(4): 317 - 322.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. S.
Takata, L. S. Chan, P. Shekelle, S. C. Morton, W. Mason,
and S. M. Marcy
Evidence
Assessment of Management of Acute Otitis Media: I. The Role
of Antibiotics in Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Otitis
Media
Pediatrics, August 1, 2001; 108(2): 239 - 247.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. A.
Finkelstein, R. L. Davis, S. F. Dowell, J. P. Metlay, S. B.
Soumerai, S. L. Rifas-Shiman, M. Higham, Z. Miller, I.
Miroshnik, A. Pedan, and R. Platt
Reducing
Antibiotic Use in Children: A Randomized Trial in 12
Practices
Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 1 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.
Little, C. Gould, I. Williamson, M. Moore, G. Warner, and
J. Dunleavey
Pragmatic
randomised controlled trial of two prescribing strategies
for childhood acute otitis media
BMJ, February 10, 2001; 322(7282): 336 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R.
Dagan, K. P. Klugman, W. A. Craig, and F. Baquero
Evidence to
support the rationale that bacterial eradication in
respiratory tract infection is an important aim of
antimicrobial therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2001;
47(2): 129 - 140.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.
Thornett, E. I Cantekin, E. King, R J Lilford, D.
Braunholtz, G Sandhu, H A Saleh, T Wright, R A M J
Damoiseaux, F A M van Balen, A W Hoes, T J M Verheij, and R
A de Melker
Amoxicillin
for otitis media in general practice
BMJ, September 23, 2000; 321(7263): 765 - 765.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. F.
Pass
Respiratory
Virus Infection and Otitis Media
Pediatrics, August 1, 1998; 102(2): 400 - 401.
[Full
Text] [PDF]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. A
M J Damoiseaux, F. A M van Balen, A. W Hoes, T. J M
Verheij, and R. A de Melker
Primary care
based randomised, double blind trial of amoxicillin versus
placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2
years
BMJ, February 5, 2000; 320(7231): 350 - 354.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T.
Arvola, K. Laiho, S. Torkkeli, H. Mykkänen, S. Salminen, L.
Maunula, and E. Isolauri
Prophylactic
Lactobacillus GG Reduces Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in
Children With Respiratory Infections: A Randomized
Study
Pediatrics, November 1, 1999; 104(5): 64e - 64.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.
O'Neill
Clinical
evidence: Acute otitis media
BMJ, September 25, 1999; 319(7213): 833 - 835.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C.
Cates
An evidence
based approach to reducing antibiotic use in children with
acute otitis media: controlled before and after
study
BMJ, March 13, 1999; 318(7185): 715 - 716.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T.
Fahey, N. Stocks, and T. Thomas
Systematic
review of the treatment of upper respiratory tract
infection
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 1998; 79(3): 225
- 230.
[Abstract]
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H.
Bauchner and B. Philipp
Reducing
Inappropriate Oral Antibiotic Use: A Prescription for
Change
Pediatrics, July 1, 1998; 102(1): 142 - 144.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.
Huovinen and O. Cars
Control of
antimicrobial resistance: time for
action
BMJ, September 5, 1998; 317(7159): 613 - 614.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T.
Fahey, D. Sharp, A. Majeed, and T. Harris
Acute otitis
media in children
BMJ, February 14, 1998; 316(7131): 630a - 630.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A.
Majeed and T. Harris
Acute otitis
media in children
BMJ, August 9, 1997; 315(7104): 321 - 322.
[Full
Text]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related
letters in BMJ:
Acute
otitis media in children
Tom Fahey, Deborah Sharp, Azeem Majeed, and Tess Harris
BMJ 1998 316: 630.
[Letter]
Amoxicillin
for otitis media in general practice
Andrew Thornett, Erdem I Cantekin, Elizabeth King, R J
Lilford, David Braunholtz, G Sandhu, H A Saleh, T Wright, R
A M J Damoiseaux, F A M van Balen, A W Hoes, T J M Verheij,
and R A de Melker
BMJ 2000 321: 765.
[Letter]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
